The Notation is language-specific so there is a possibility to select the language that is used for interpretation.


2012/3/28 Mark Fortner <phidias51@gmail.com>
Done.  http://argouml.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6420

The only thing I haven't thought through is how language-specific packaging separators would be specified.  In Java we use dots, in UML double colons. I leave that as an implementation detail. :-)


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Bob Tarling <bob.tarling@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mark

Again, I'm afraid what you're asking for doesn't currently exist as a feature.

It would be a very useful feature though. Please create an issue for it and assign as to the "notation" subcomponent.


On 27 March 2012 22:06, Mark Fortner <phidias51@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Tom,
When I try naming the package that way, I don't get the hierarchy I want.  I often need to create subpackages.  It would be nice if the package name were parsed for separators, and the appropriate hierarchy generated.


On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mark Fortner <phidias51@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a quick way to create packages in ArgoUML?  I was trying to create
> a package like com.google.whatever.  Rather than creating a "folder" for
> each part of the domain I wanted to simply specify com.google.whatever and
> have it create the appropriate set of nested folders.  I tried with both
> Java style and UML style package names, and neither seemed to create the
> appropriate nesting.  Is there another way of doing this?

I don't think that there's a way to create a complete folder hierarchy
in one go, but there's no rule saying that you have to start at the
root.  You could name your top level folder com.google (or whatever)
and just nest any additional namespaces under that.



To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@argouml.tigris.org].